Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How robust is journal rating in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a large-scale, multi-method exercise

16 references·16 citing·38 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
2005The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s910 cited
1979Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?908 cited
1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
1977Referencing as Persuasion690 cited
2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases498 cited
2003Characteristics of highly cited papers491 cited
1985Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR)258 cited
1994Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact239 cited
1996Impact factors can mislead227 cited
2007Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

209 cited

2005The hand of science: academic writing and its rewards201 cited

Cited by

2017The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures38 cited
2018An analysis of citation functions in the humanities and social sciences research from the perspective of problematic citation analysis assumptions33 cited
2018La evaluación de las Humanidades y de las Ciencias Sociales en revisión29 cited
2023In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?23 cited
2022Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe19 cited
2022Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review19 cited
2021The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall's List of potentially predatory publishers and journals18 cited
2021Academic research evaluation in artistic disciplines: the case of Poland18 cited
2020Toward a classification of Spanish scholarly journals in social sciences and humanities considering their impact and visibility17 cited
2024Exploring research quality and journal representation: a comparative study of African Journals Online, Scopus, and Web of Science16 cited
2015Journal ratings as predictors of articles quality in Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: an analysis based on the Italian Research Evaluation Exercise16 cited
2020Two Decades of Research Assessment in Italy. Addressing the Criticisms16 cited
2022The effect of journal metrics on academic resume assessment15 cited
2021Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities14 cited
2020Two Decades of Experience in Research Assessment in Italy13 cited
2020On the use of journal classification in social sciences and humanities: evidence from an Italian database9 cited