Confidence—More a Personality or Ability Trait? It Depends on How It Is Measured: A Comparison of Young and Older Adults

Karina M. Burns · Nicholas R. Burns · Lynn Ward

57 citations0/0 files storedFrontiers in Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Personality Traits and Psychology Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

The current study (N = 244) compared two independently developed and substantively different measures of self-confidence; a self-report measure, and a measure described as "online." Online measures are confidence-accuracy judgments made following each item on a cognitive task; in the current study, online measures were yoked to tasks of fluid and crystallized intelligence. The self-report and online measures had not previously been compared, and it was unknown if they captured the same self-confidence construct. These measures were also compared to self-efficacy and personality for the purpose of defining self-confidence as an independent construct, as well as to clarify the primary comparison. This study also aimed to replicate previous findings of a stable factor of confidence derived from online measures. An age comparison was made between a young adult sample (30 years and under) and an older adult sample (65 years and over) to determine how confidence functions across the lifespan. The primary finding was that self-report and online measures of confidence define two different but modestly correlated factors. Moreover, the self-report measures sit closer to personality, and the online measures sit closer to ability. While online measures of confidence were distinct from self-efficacy and personality, self-report measures were very closely related to the personality trait Emotional Stability. A general confidence factor-derived from online measures-was identified, and importantly was found in not just young adults but also in older adults. In terms of the age comparison, older adults had higher self-report self-confidence, and tended to be more overconfident in their judgments for online measures; however this overconfidence was more striking in the online measures attached to fluid ability than to crystallized ability.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

References

1966The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors 1965A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis 2009Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling 2000Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development.2010Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling.2003Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?2000Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development.1999Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures.

Cited by

2018Teachers' cognitive processing of complex school-based scenarios: Differences across experience levels 2017Metacognitive monitoring of working memory performance and its relationship to academic achievement in Grade 4 children 2020Older Adults’ Beliefs About their Ability to Understand Others’ Mental States

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.