Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis

16 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1973The Normative Structure of Science1,623 cited
2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2009How professors think: inside the curious world of academic judgment601 cited
2009Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators598 cited
2000The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process514 cited
2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
1992Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy280 cited
2010Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?177 cited
1990Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy.175 cited
2008Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study169 cited
2009Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey155 cited
2008Reviewing Peer Review119 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2012Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals108 cited

Cited by

2017The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review75 cited
2017Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals56 cited
2019Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study50 cited
2018Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation50 cited
2019The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal48 cited
2017Scientometrics of peer review43 cited
2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review38 cited
2020Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports35 cited
2022Understanding the peer review endeavor in scientific publishing32 cited
2017Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation32 cited
2018The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals30 cited
2022Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals29 cited
2018On the money value of peer review27 cited
2022A study of referencing changes in preprint-publication pairs across multiple fields27 cited
2020Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?26 cited
2022Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers18 cited