SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleUsing GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency

Kristina A. Thayer2016

Article2016

Using GRADE to respond to health questions with different levels of urgency

Kristina A. Thayer · Holger Jens Schünemann

31 citations·0/0 files stored·Environment International

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Clinical practice guidelines implementation Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

References

2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence 2011GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision 2011GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency 2011GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias 2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence 2015Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients

Cited by

2019GRADE guidelines for environmental and occupational health: A new series of articles in Environment International 2023Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution 2020Collaborating in response to COVID-19: editorial and methods initiatives across Cochrane 2020GRADE-Leitlinien: 18. Wie ROBINS-I und andere Instrumente zur Einschätzung des Risikos für Bias von nicht-randomisierten Studien verwendet werden sollten, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit eines Evidenzkörpers zu bewerten

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2022Using Systematic Reviews in Guideline Developmentreview · 11 shared references 2020GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence—An overview in the context of health decision-makingarticle · 8 shared references 2018Using systematic reviews in guideline development: The GRADE approachreview · 8 shared references 2018Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studiesreview · 8 shared references 2024Implementing GRADE in systematic reviews that adhere to JBI methodological conductreview · 8 shared references 2012Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorderreview · 7 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typearticle

Published2016-04-30

VenueEnvironment International

ISSN-L0160-4120

Languageen

Citations31

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.027

openalex_workW2343171978

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.