SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleA new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus

Henk F. Moed2016

Article2016

A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus

Henk F. Moed · Judit Bar‐Ilan · Gali Halevi

144 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Library Science and Information Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 144 citations exist upstream.

References

2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison 1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals 2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science 2007Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar 1976Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics

Cited by

2019Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment 2017The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university 2018General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators 2018Enabling the language of accessible tourism

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2022Types of Errors Hiding in Google Scholar Dataarticle · 11 shared references 2015A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorspreprint · 11 shared references 2015Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Webarticle · 10 shared references 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 9 shared references 2021Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academiaarticle · 9 shared references 2016Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents?article · 8 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typearticle

Published2016-04-30

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations144

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.017

openalex_workW2345690680

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2021Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level

2017ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?

2024Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite

2017Google Scholar como una fuente de evaluación científica: una revisión bibliográfica sobre errores de la base de datos