Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality?

Abstract

One measure of the quality of research presented at the annual scientific meeting is publication of the data presented in a peer review journal. This allows for a more rigorous review of design, methodology and conclusions. To determine the rate of subsequent publication, MEDLARS searches were performed on the 269 presented abstracts at the 1984 and 1986 meetings of the American Association of Poison Control Centers, The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, The American Board of Medical Toxicology and the Canadian Association of Poison Control Centers. Of the 296 presented abstracts, 134 (49.8%) were published. There was no difference in the eventual publication rate between the 1984 and 1986 meeting. There were 38 non-reviewed symposia publications and 96 peer-reviewed articles. Publications of 35.7% of presented abstracts in peer review journals compares poorly with the percentage of peer-reviewed publication from other scientific meetings. If publication in a peer-review journal is important, steps should be taken to improve the percentage of presented abstracts that are accepted by peer-review journals.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.