Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings

16 references·11 citing·25 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
1996Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists567 cited
2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists566 cited
1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
1988Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both?334 cited
1998A model for case assessment and interpretation299 cited
2009Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion252 cited
2000The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements209 cited
1991The Use Of Statistics In Forensic Science184 cited
2015ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science179 cited
2011Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement116 cited
2011Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T102 cited
2013The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: Verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

90 cited

1995Avoiding the transposed conditional87 cited

Cited by

2019Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis57 cited
2018Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions39 cited
2022The logic of forensic pathology opinion22 cited
2022Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency20 cited
2018Resolving differing expert opinions18 cited
2021Toward a common language for quality issues in forensic science16 cited
2025A guide to ISO 21043 Forensic Sciences from the perspective of the forensic-data-science paradigm14 cited
2019Bayesian networks for the interpretation of biological evidence14 cited
2020Interpol review of glass and paint evidence 2016-201913 cited
2017Ink dating part II: Interpretation of results in a legal perspective13 cited
2017What is the error margin of your signature analysis?11 cited