SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors.
0 references·10 citing·50 second hop
Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Registration Policy: a survey among journal editors. (2014)Endorsement of ICMJE's Clinical Trial Reg…Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in 585 clinical trials investigating drugs for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (2021)Trial registration and select…Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy (2020)Searching practices and inclu…Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals (2017)Requirements for trial regist…Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–2013 (2017)Randomized clinical trials in…Clinical trial registration in fertility trials – a case for improvement? (2017)Clinical trial registration i…A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)A systematic review of the pr…Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication (2016)Reported estimates of diagnos…Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning (2016)Prevention of selective outco…Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish (2016)Major discrepancies between w…Trial registration 10 years on (2015)Trial registration 10 years onPublication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in cardiovascular journals (2017)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery Journals (2018)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Publication bias may exist among prognostic accuracy studies of middle cerebral artery Doppler ultrasound (2019)Publication Bias: Association of Diagnostic Accuracy in Radiology Conference Abstracts with Full-Text Publication (2019)Frequency of Abstracts Presented at Eye and Vision Conferences Being Developed Into Full-Length Publications (2020)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications (2017)Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects (2020)How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine? (2024)Design of Experiments (1936)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: A systematic review and meta-analyses (2021)Selective outcome reporting in paediatric dentistry restorative treatment randomised clinical trials—A meta‐research (2022)Selective outcome reporting among randomized controlled trials published in leading dental journals: A research-on-research study (2024)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Unreported links between trial registrations and published articles were identified using document similarity measures in a cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (2017)A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses (2023)Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study (2024)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals (2021)Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study (2023)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample (2022)The relationship between endorsing reporting guidelines or trial registration and the impact factor or total citations in surgical journals (2022)The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study (2023)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Spin in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2019)Trends and predictors of biomedical research quality, 1990–2015: a meta-research study (2019)Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Ensuring the rigor in systematic reviews: Part 1, the overview (2020)Creativity and the Dark Triad: A meta-analysis (2021)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Supporting study registration to reduce research waste (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results47 cited
  • 2015Trial registration 10 years on46 cited
  • 2017Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–201343 cited
  • 2016Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning32 cited
  • 2016Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish26 cited
  • 2020Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy23 cited
  • 2017Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals20 cited
  • 2016Reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy in ophthalmology conference abstracts were not associated with full-text publication17 cited
  • 2021Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in 585 clinical trials investigating drugs for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting16 cited
  • 2017Clinical trial registration in fertility trials – a case for improvement?14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work