SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review · Study

ReviewPicosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review

Ofer Reiter2016

Review2016

Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review

Ofer Reiter · Lihi Atzmony · Lehavit Akerman · Assi Levi · Ruben Kershenovich · Moshe Lapidoth +1 more

61 citations·0/0 files stored·Lasers in Medical Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications Laser Material Processing Techniques Dermatologic Treatments and Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 61 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.2006Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: A national data set 1998Comparison of Responses of Tattoos to Picosecond and Nanosecond Q-Switched Neodymium:YAG Lasers 1993The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser effectively treats tattoos. A controlled, dose-response study 1993The Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Effectively Treats Tattoos

Cited by

2018Laser assisted tattoo removal – state of the art and new developments 2020Laser tattoo removal: Fundamental principles and practical approach 2020Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic review 2022Laser tattoo removal: laser principles and an updated guide for clinicians

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Laser assisted tattoo removal – state of the art and new developmentsreview · 11 shared references 2020Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic reviewreview · 11 shared references 2016Neodymium‐doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd: YAG ) 1064‐nm picosecond laser vs. Nd: YAG 1064‐nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single‐blind clinical trialarticle · 10 shared references 2017Laser Treatment of Professional Tattoos With a 1064/532-nm Dual-Wavelength Picosecond Laserarticle · 10 shared references 2020The First Commercial 730 nm Picosecond‐Domain Laser is Safe and Effective for Treating Multicolor Tattoosarticle · 10 shared references 2006Treatment of Tattooschapter · 10 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typereview

Published2016-06-16

VenueLasers in Medical Science

ISSN-L0268-8921

Languageen

Citations61

Files0 public / 0

ShelfTattoo and Body Piercing Complications

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s10103-016-2001-0

openalex_workW2433301952

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2017

Visualization of laser tattoo removal treatment effects in a mouse model by two-photon microscopy

2022Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage

2024Laser tattoo removal strategies: Part II: A review of the methods, techniques, and complications involved in tattoo removal

2019Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium‐Doped Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal