Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review

16 references·12 citing·28 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
2006Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: A national data set582 cited
1998Comparison of Responses of Tattoos to Picosecond and Nanosecond Q-Switched Neodymium:YAG Lasers296 cited
1993The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser effectively treats tattoos. A controlled, dose-response study201 cited
1993The Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Effectively Treats Tattoos166 cited
2012Treatment of Tattoos With a Picosecond Alexandrite Laser145 cited
2012Successful and Rapid Treatment of Blue and Green Tattoo Pigment With a Novel Picosecond Laser144 cited
2011Laser Tattoo Removal: A Review140 cited
2002Laser‐tattoo removal—a study of the mechanism and the optimal treatment strategy via computer simulations122 cited
2011Tattoo inks in general usage contain nanoparticles119 cited
1967Laser treatment of tattoos. A preliminary survey of three year's clinical experience

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

113 cited

1999Comparison of the Q-Switched Alexandrite, ND:YAG, and Ruby Lasers in Treating Blue-Black Tattoos111 cited

1999A clinical and histologic prospective controlled comparative study of the picosecond titanium:sapphire (795 nm) laser versus the Q-switched alexandrite (752 nm) laser for removing tattoo pigment105 cited

Cited by

2018Laser assisted tattoo removal – state of the art and new developments49 cited
2020Laser tattoo removal: Fundamental principles and practical approach46 cited
2020Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic review41 cited
2022Laser tattoo removal: laser principles and an updated guide for clinicians40 cited
2017Visualization of laser tattoo removal treatment effects in a mouse model by two-photon microscopy16 cited
2022Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage15 cited
2024Laser tattoo removal strategies: Part II: A review of the methods, techniques, and complications involved in tattoo removal13 cited
2019Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium‐Doped Yttrium–Aluminum–Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal12 cited
2023Comprehensive examination of tattoo removal using a 150 ps Nd:YAG laser in a porcine model12 cited
2021Comparison of picosecond versus nanosecond Nd:YAG lasers for the removal of cosmetic tattoos in an animal model9 cited
2023Laser Removal of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos with a Picosecond Laser6 cited
2025A New Predictive Model for Tattoo Removal: Leveraging Patient and Tattoo Characteristics4 cited