Article2016

Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion?

105 citations0/0 files storedAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting and Organizational Management Corporate Governance and Financial Management

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to characterize how those who perform (internal auditors), mandate (audit committee (AC) members), use (AC members and external auditors) and normalize (the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA)) internal audit work, respectively make sense of the notion of “internal audit quality” (IAQ). Design/methodology/approach – This study is predicated on the meta-analysis of extant literature on IAQ, 56 interviews with internal auditors and AC members of public or para-public sector organizations in Canada, and archival documents published by the IIA, analyzed in the light of framing theory. Findings – Four interpretative schemes (or frames) emerge from the analysis, called “manager,” “éminence grise,” “professional” and “watchdog.” They respectively correspond to internal auditors’, AC members’, the IIA’s and external auditors’ viewpoints and suggest radically different perspectives on how IAQ should be defined and controlled (via input, throughput, output or professional controls). Research limitations/implications – Empirically, the authors focus on rare research data. Theoretically, the authors delineate four previously undocumented competing frames of IAQ. Practical implications – Practically, the various governance actors involved in assessing IAQ can learn from the study that they should confront their views to better coordinate their quality control efforts. Originality/value – Highlighting the contrast between these frames is important because, so far, extant literature has predominantly focussed on only one perspective on IAQ, that of external auditors. The authors suggest that IAQ is more polysemous and complex than previously acknowledged, which justifies the qualitative and interpretive approach.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 105 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1992Basics of Qualitative Research 1975Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.2000Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment 1999Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data 2024Interpreting Qualitative Data 2007Methodological fit in management field research 2008Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty

Cited by

2018Internal audit function, audit committee effectiveness and accountability in the Ugandan statutory corporations 2020What is the value of internal auditing? – A literature review on qualitative and quantitative perspectives 2017Internal Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Committee Members, Senior Management, and Internal Auditors 2017Internal audit organisational status, competencies, activities and fraud management in the financial services sector 2020Internal audit: from effectiveness to organizational significance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.