SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Literature Review: A Foundation for High-Quality Medical Education Research
8 references·2 citing·36 second hop
The Literature Review: A Foundation for High-Quality Medical Education Research (2016)The Literature Review: A Foundation for H…Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach (2012)Conducting systematic reviews…AM Last Page: How to Perform an Effective Database Search (2011)AM Last Page: How to Perform …Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13 (2010)Conducting a best evidence sy…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 2: Constructing searches (2003)BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic …Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)Reasons Reviewers Reject and …Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)Scholarship Reconsidered: Pri…Interdisciplinary mixed methods systematic reviews: Reflections on methodological best practices, theoretical considerations, and practical implications across disciplines (2022)Interdisciplinary mixed metho…Social Networks as an Approach to Systematic review (2018)Social Networks as an Approac…The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses (1965)Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)Limited by our limitations (2019)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Searching the Literature (1994)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency (2006)Mentoring relationships between senior physicians and junior doctors and/or medical students: A thematic review (2017)Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019 (2020)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Educational Technologies in Problem-Based Learning in Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Spiritual Care Training Provided to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review (2015)A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education (2017)TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK. (1967)The study of teaching (1974)Evaluation of Training (1993)A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors (2012)Training to reduce LGBTQ-related bias among medical, nursing, and dental students and providers: a systematic review (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Self-Control Procedures in Personal Behavior Problems (1965)Co-Word Analysis (1993)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Journal of higher education (1996)Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution (2010)Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 1992Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate6,829 cited
  • 2001Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts235 cited
  • 2010Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13230 cited
  • 2012Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach186 cited
  • 2003BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 2: Constructing searches162 cited
  • 2011AM Last Page: How to Perform an Effective Database Search10 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Interdisciplinary mixed methods systematic reviews: Reflections on methodological best practices, theoretical considerations, and practical implications across disciplines27 cited
  • 2018Social Networks as an Approach to Systematic review18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work