A Mismatch of Methods

Abstract

Abstract This chapter talks about the book's hybrid theory of morality, or at least of the part of morality that tells us which acts are wrong. The theory is elaborated by way of an extended and inventive critical reconstruction of Immanuel Kant's ethics as a kind of contractualism. What makes it hybrid is the conjunction of the contractualist framework with an account of value that is for the most part concerned with outcome effects on well-being. This chapter comments on the hybrid methodological approach to understanding the ambitions of Kant's moral theory, which it argues is anything but hybrid. Given that the defining feature of Kant's theory is that goodness is a function of — and not independent of — moral principle, it challenges the book's revisionary interpretive project, which aims to elicit the best in Kant's ethics by evaluating and revising its claims in terms of non-moral good outcomes. More specifically, the chapter argues that the project does not capture what is most distinctive about Kant's theory; the mismatch of methods is too profound.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.