SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (2016)Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta…Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Thresholds for statistical an…Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Recommendations for examining…Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Ea…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation (2008)Sensitivity of between-study …How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Does the inclusion of grey li…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified (2008)Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead (2008)Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. (2012)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
  • 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation1,146 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2000Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

811 cited
  • 2014Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods704 cited
  • 2010Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis613 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.