SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

State-of-the-Art Reporting · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterState-of-the-Art Reporting

Akira Ōnishi2016

Chapter2016

State-of-the-Art Reporting

Akira Ōnishi · Toshi A. Furukawa

20 citations·0/0 files stored·Springer eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Clinical practice guidelines implementation Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies 2014A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles

Cited by

2023Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews 2022Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidencereview · 7 shared references 2013Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agenciesarticle · 7 shared references 2010The art and science of knowledge synthesisarticle · 6 shared references 2014Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement propertiesreview · 6 shared references 2019Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic datareview · 6 shared references 2017Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklistreview · 5 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typechapter

Published2016-01-01

VenueSpringer eBooks

Languageen

Citations20

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_13

openalex_workW2492408337

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.