SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
State-of-the-Art Reporting
16 references·2 citing·50 second hopsampled
State-of-the-Art Reporting (2016)State-of-the-Art ReportingPublication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study (2014)Publication bias is underrepo…A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)A GRADE Working Group approac…Quality and transparency of overviews of systematic reviews (2012)Quality and transparency of o…Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review (2012)Overviews of reviews often ha…A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 (2012)A Descriptive Analysis of Ove…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews (2008)Using Existing Systematic Rev…Overviews of Reviews (2008)Overviews of ReviewsAssessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)A Brief History of Research S…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)A guide to interpreting disco…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for…Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement (2022)Reporting guideline for overv…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions (2001)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2014A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis1,812 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2002A Brief History of Research Synthesis552 cited
  • 1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
  • 2012A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011241 cited
  • 2008Overviews of Reviews218 cited
  • 2012Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review213 cited
  • 2008Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

144 cited
  • 2014Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study73 cited
  • 2012Quality and transparency of overviews of systematic reviews62 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Preferred Reporting Items for Resistance Exercise Studies (PRIRES): A Checklist Developed Using an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews19 cited
    • 2022Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement16 cited