The Demise of the Analogue Mind: Digital Primal Fantasies and the Technologies of Loss-less-ness

Abstract

In 2011 the British artist Tacita Dean’s installation FILM opened in the Turbine Hall of the Tate Modern in London as part of the Unilever series. It was an 11-minute silent 35mm montage film projected onto a 13 metre high monolith standing at the end of the darkened hall. This work was her response to ‘a particular historical moment, in which the rapid shift from analogue to digital technologies threatens the medium’s survival’ (Dean 2011, p.8). Dean’s passion for celluloid, for the photochemical (analogue) process of creating audiovisual objects and her deep mourning for its demise is shared by the 80 artists, musicians, filmmakers and writers she commissioned to write in her catalogue about what they consider to be the profound cultural and psychic loss we, as a generation, are supposedly in the process of suffering as a result of analogue obsolescence. The installation and the catalogue read both as a doomed polemic or manifesto calling for the resistance to the totalizing embrace of the digital revolution and simultaneously a melancholy eulogy, in Adrian Searle’s words 1 : a ‘homage or requiem’ to the dying medium of analogue film. What becomes clear when considering Dean’s installation and catalogue in the broader context of contemporary techno-cultural change is that what is being mourned here is in no way confined to aesthetic process, to art, and filmmaking but instead Dean et al. are mourning a way of being, an ontology, a model of psyche and subjectivity: the death of a particular model of mind — what Thomas Elsaesser calls ‘the analogue model of trace and imprint’ (2009, p.102) which for Marina Warner are ‘meta-physical qualities’ that ‘connect to deep-seated feelings about loss’ (Dean, 2011, p.136). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.