Networks of Criminality: The State and Crime Policy in Contemporary Democracy

Abstract

Why do so many security policies fail in Latin America?This article shows that it is difficult to uproot criminality because it is an inherent part of the development of both states and democratic regimes.More specifically, it is part of the three main networks of security providers: the executive branch; the criminal justice system; and the sector of armed non-state entities.Relations within and between these three networks reflect their own interests and powers rather than public security, undermining policy from the beginning.This article will apply this analytical framework to two principal dimensions of public security in Latin America.One is of illegally trafficked goods, such as narcotics; the specific case study here is of the trafficking of firearms.The second dimension is the set of security policies in a country, which range from iron fist crackdowns to community policing.The case study is Honduras, which has endured nearly every security problem that afflicts the region, responding with policies that failed for 15 years until they began to shift attention toward the networks of criminality that were obstructing them.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.