SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings
0 references·6 citing·19 second hop
A proposal for judging the trustworthiness of research findings (2014)A proposal for judging the trustworthines…Judging the relative trustworthiness of research results: How to do it and why it matters (2024)Judging the relative trustwor…Positive psychology and language learning: A systematic scoping review (2023)Positive psychology and langu…Assessing the range and evidence‐base of interventions in a cluster of schools (2022)Assessing the range and evide…Public perceptions of motivational factors influencing employee's service delivery performance in Gauteng province/region (2016)Public perceptions of motivat…What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’ (2015)What to do instead of signifi…The role of parents in young people’s education—a critical review of the causal evidence (2015)The role of parents in young …Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox (1967)The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing (1978)The New Statistics (2013)Do we really need confidence intervals in the new statistics? (2018)The black-white test score gap (1999)The Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Urban Secondary School Student Academic Achievement (2006)School readiness and later achievement. (2007)The Practice of Social Research. (1976)Bridging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems1 (2013)The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. (2013)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Positive psychology: An introduction. (2000)On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being (2001)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research (2002)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015The role of parents in young people’s education—a critical review of the causal evidence62 cited
  • 2023Positive psychology and language learning: A systematic scoping review28 cited
  • 2015What to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the ‘number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding’25 cited
  • 2024Judging the relative trustworthiness of research results: How to do it and why it matters22 cited
  • 2022Assessing the range and evidence‐base of interventions in a cluster of schools20 cited
  • 2016Public perceptions of motivational factors influencing employee's service delivery performance in Gauteng province/region3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work