Article2016

Street-level bureaucrats as strategy shapers in social and health service delivery: Empirical evidence from six countries

Petri Juhani Virtanen · Ilpo Laitinen · Jari Stenvall

28 citations0/0 files storedInternational Social Work

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Public Administration in Developing Nations Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

In this research article, we discuss the social construction of public services within the conceptual and theoretical framework provided by Lipsky. We are interested in what it means if/when street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) have an active role in the construction of a service system. We argue that there are multiple realities in terms of the construction of public services and we approach the question by deploying Lipsky’s notion on SLBs by empirically analysing middle managers’ views on how SLBs act and their role in this construction process. This paper is based on empirical interviews (N=100) collated in 2012 from Barcelona, Den Bosch, Glasgow, Melbourne, Toronto, Vancouver, the Greater London area, and the US state of Vermont. The research collation strategy was to include reform-oriented cities and countries in terms of developing and delivering public services. We found that SLBs have three different kinds of strategies in the construction process: policy-making, working practices, and professionalism. We found that there are no conflicts arising from SLBs’ beliefs, organisational demands, and rules and regulations. Instead, SLBs try to solve conflicts or bridge gaps between policy-making and practical work in the boundaries between SLBs and service users. Based on this research, the role of SLBs and the built-in flexibility and agility of public service leadership and organisations must be addressed and developed further. The role of organisational learning and changing organisational cultures must also be scrutinized in the context of public service systems. The analysis of professional resilience in the context of public services planning needs more theoretical and empirical attention. The resilience of organisations and the capacities of SLBs need to be researched more. Finally, there is the need for better cultivation of the role of the SLBs and service users with regard to accountability aspects (horizontal and vertical).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1990The three worlds of welfare capitalism 2003Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing 2003Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology 1989Social Identity Theory and the Organization 2013Academy of Management Journal 2004The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers 1980Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service 2006The New Public Governance? 1

Cited by

2021A community of practice approach to enhancing academic integrity policy translation: a case study 2021Central‐local tensions in the decentralization of social policies: Street‐level bureaucrats and social practices in the Netherlands 2024Street-level bureaucrats as policymakers in the implementation of information system in social services 2020Citizen‐agency versus state‐agency at the frontline in prisons and probation services: A systematic literature review 2021Beyond the Front-Line: the Coping Strategies and Discretion of Lithuanian Street-Level Bureaucracy During COVID-19

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.