SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
The quality of the reported sample size calculations in randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed (2016)The quality of the reported sample size c…Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality (2013)Randomised controlled trials …Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Consolidated standards of rep…Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8 (2011)Impact of CONSORT extension f…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed (2010)Reviews assessing the quality…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature (2008)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols (2008)Discrepancies in sample size …The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The quality of randomized tri…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently (2005)An analysis of general medica…Investigation of within‐study selective reporting in clinical research: follow‐up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee (2002)Investigation of within‐study…Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles (2002)Association of Journal Qualit…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals (2009)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. (2004)Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies in EMBASE. (2006)Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses (2012)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The CONSORT statement (2019)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 2012Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals739 cited
  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • 2002Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles284 cited
  • 2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
  • 2011Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8192 cited
  • 2002Investigation of within‐study selective reporting in clinical research: follow‐up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee97 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature87 cited
  • 2013Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality81 cited
  • 2005An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently76 cited
  • 2010Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed74 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.