Towards evidence based researchHans Lund, Klara Brunnhuber, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Karen A. Robinson, Marlies Leenaars, Bertil Fabricius Dorch, Gro Jamtvedt, Monica Wammen Nortvedt +2 more2016-10-21articleBMJ133 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementationAbstractTo avoid waste of research, no new studies should be done without a systematic review of existing evidence, argue Hans Lund and colleaguesCitations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 133 citations exist upstream.References2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice GapCited by2016Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?2019Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion