S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Dashboard
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Carsten Bogh Juhl · Study
Home
/
Author
Carsten Bogh Juhl
14 works
· latest 2022
· 2 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0001-8456-5364
Works
14 shown
Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review
Systematic Reviews
·
2022
·
13 authors
·
review
·
Open access
31
citations
Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
PLoS ONE
·
2022
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
19
citations
Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
Systematic Reviews
·
2022
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
17
citations
Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2022
·
5 authors
·
review
29
citations
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
15 authors
·
Open access
94
citations
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
6 authors
·
Open access
146
citations
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
16 authors
·
Open access
56
citations
Controversy and Debate on Meta-epidemiology. Paper 1: Treatment effect sizes vary in randomized trials depending on the type of outcome measure
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
18
citations
Do we really need another systematic review?
British Journal of Sports Medicine
·
2018
·
2 authors
·
editorial
17
citations
Some Cochrane risk-of-bias items are not important in osteoarthritis trials: a meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2017
·
13 authors
·
review
·
Open access
23
citations
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2016
·
3 authors
·
review
·
Open access
67
citations
The effects of language- and literacy-focused professional development on early educators and children: A best-evidence meta-analysis
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
·
2016
·
6 authors
251
citations
Towards evidence based research
BMJ
·
2016
·
10 authors
·
Open access
133
citations
Systematic reviews and research waste
The Lancet
·
2016
·
3 authors
·
review
26
citations