SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Systematic reviews and research waste · Study

ReviewSystematic reviews and research waste

Hans Lund2016

Review2016

Systematic reviews and research waste

Hans Lund · Carsten Bogh Juhl · Robin Christensen

26 citations·0/0 files stored·The Lancet

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence 2014Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses 2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting 2011A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials 2015How systematic reviews cause research waste 2008Commentary: Which meta-analyses are conclusive?

Cited by

2021Nearly One‐Third of Published Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses Yield Inconclusive Conclusions: A Systematic Review 2018Do we really need another systematic review?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2016Towards evidence based researcharticle · 3 shared references 2013Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James LindInitiative, 2003–2013article · 3 shared references 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure valuearticle · 3 shared references 2013The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trialsreview · 3 shared references 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic changearticle · 3 shared references 2015Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examinationreview · 3 shared references

Details

Year2016

Typereview

Published2016-01-01

VenueThe Lancet

ISSN-L0099-5355

Languageen

Citations26

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01354-9

openalex_workW2228072156

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.