SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Interfield equality: Journals versus researchers
14 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Interfield equality: Journals versus researchers (2016)Interfield equality: Journals versus rese…Interfield comparison of academic output by using department level data (2015)Interfield comparison of acad…Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines (2015)Distributions of scientific f…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Why do economists publish less? (2014)Why do economists publish les…Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Performance-based university …Distribution of academic research funds: a case of Japanese national research grant (2011)Distribution of academic rese…An evaluation of the Australian Research Council's journal ranking (2011)An evaluation of the Australi…National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level (2010)National-scale research perfo…A made-to-measure indicator for cross-disciplinary bibliometric ranking of researchers performance (2010)A made-to-measure indicator f…The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions (2009)The field factor: towards a m…Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)Allocative efficiency in publ…University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison (2003)University Research Evaluatio…Three scientometric etudes on developing countries as a tribute to Michael Moravcsik (1992)Three scientometric etudes on…Number of references in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1910–1985 (1991)Number of references in bioch…A Formula for the Gini Coefficient (1979)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)Underestimating or overestimating the distribution inequality of research funding? The influence of funding sources and subdivision (2017)How to optimize the allocation of research resources? An empirical study based on output and substitution elasticities of universities in Chinese provincial level (2019)Configurational determinants of time-to-win in NSFC youth program funding: Insights from Chinese library and information science (2024)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage In The United States: 2006 (2007)Comparison of Brazilian researchers in clinical medicine: are criteria for ranking well-adjusted? (2011)Decomposing inequality in research funding by university-institute sub-group: A three-stage nested Theil index (2018)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Can the technological impact of academic journals be evaluated? The practice of non-patent reference (NPR) analysis (2014)A critical cluster analysis of 44 indicators of author-level performance (2016)Indexing of authors according to their domain of expertise (2017)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (2005)Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications (2010)Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications (2012)Ranking Games (2014)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts (2002)The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance (2012)Individual research performance: A proposal for comparing apples to oranges (2013)Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA (2019)Assessing basic research (1983)Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology (1988)The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? (2001)Tertiary education for the knowledge society (2008)University corporatisation: Driving redefinition (2010)Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union (2011)Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact (1994)Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes (2003)Hans Excellens : Om miljardsatsningarna på starka forskningsmiljöer (2010)Towards field-adjusted production: Estimating research productivity from a zero-truncated distribution (2016)Performance-Based Evaluation Metrics: Influence at the Macro, Meso, and Micro Level (2022)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism (2012)Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens (2012)The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments (2014)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2011Performance-based university research funding systems1,017 cited
  • 2003University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison635 cited
  • 2008Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?170 cited
  • 2010National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level64 cited
  • 2011An evaluation of the Australian Research Council's journal ranking43 cited
  • 2011Distribution of academic research funds: a case of Japanese national research grant40 cited
  • 2015Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines28 cited
  • 2009The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions26 cited
  • 2010A made-to-measure indicator for cross-disciplinary bibliometric ranking of researchers performance23 cited
  • 2015Interfield comparison of academic output by using department level data17 cited
  • 1991Number of references in biochemistry and other fields; A case study of the Journal of Biological Chemistry throughout 1910–198516 cited
  • 1992Three scientometric etudes on developing countries as a tribute to Michael Moravcsik14 cited
  • 2014Why do economists publish less?11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.