SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la ciencia: revisión por pares, bibliometría y pertinencia (2016)Ejes de discusión en la evaluación de la …Peer review: still king in the digital age (2014)Peer review: still king in th…Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development (2013)Excellence or quality? Impact…Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Peer review in a changing wor…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewHow Professors Think (2009)How Professors ThinkThe Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)The Four Literatures of Socia…Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Scie…Impact factors: use and abuse. (2003)Impact factors: use and abuse.Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation (2001)Scientific and technical huma…Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)Language biases in the covera…Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)Editorial peer review : its s…The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science (1998)The role of funding agencies …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy (1992)Peerless Science: Peer Review…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)The Scientific Wealth of Nations (1997)What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)Web of Science and Scopus language coverage (2019)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)Foundations of social theory (1990)Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice: Are We Putting the Cart Before the Horse? (2003)Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital (2004)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Measuring the efficiency of decision making units (1978)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences (2006)Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research (2013)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Hiring as Cultural Matching (2012)Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2005Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research979 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2003Impact factors: use and abuse.500 cited
  • 2001Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance431 cited
  • 2001Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation421 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
  • 2006The Four Literatures of Social Science369 cited
  • 1992Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy280 cited
  • 2013Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development280 cited
  • 2014Peer review: still king in the digital age243 cited
  • 2001Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

231 cited
  • 1998The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science226 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.