SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Techniques Made Simple: Workflow for Searching Databases to Reduce Evidence Selection Bias in Systematic Reviews
7 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Research Techniques Made Simple: Workflow for Searching Databases to Reduce Evidence Selection Bias in Systematic Reviews (2016)Research Techniques Made Simple: Workflow…Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (2016)Research Techniques Made Simp…The Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Dermatology (2012)The Role of Systematic Review…Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review (2012)Prospective Registration and …Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses (2012)Effect of reporting bias on m…Searching for Studies (2008)Searching for StudiesInterpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis (2008)Interpretation of tests of he…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Quality and Reporting Completeness of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Dermatology (2020)Quality and Reporting Complet…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Understanding and evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2014)Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool (2017)The differential impact of scientific quality, bibliometric factors, and social media activity on the influence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about psoriasis (2018)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research (2014)A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results (2017)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Relations among posttraumatic stress disorder, comorbid major depression, and HPA function: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2012)Efficacy of internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2015)A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. (2017)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995–2019) (2020)Post-migration factors and mental health outcomes in asylum-seeking and refugee populations: a systematic review (2020)A systematic literature review on the factors influencing e-commerce adoption in developing countries (2023)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Are Dermatology Systematic Reviews Spinning Out of Control? (2021)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011)Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 2008Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysis695 cited
  • 2008Searching for Studies599 cited
  • 2016Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews315 cited
  • 2012Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses254 cited
  • 2012Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review60 cited
  • 2012The Role of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Dermatology49 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Quality and Reporting Completeness of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Dermatology16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work