Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central

9 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited

Cited by

2019Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing128 cited
2019The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019126 cited
2017Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies114 cited
2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018

Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals

92 cited

2020Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data88 cited

2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited

2019Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 201871 cited

2018Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians54 cited

2023Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices54 cited

2021Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors54 cited

2017Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review54 cited

2021A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences53 cited

2018Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils53 cited

2020Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–201752 cited

2019Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science48 cited