Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The “deliberative bureaucrat”: deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner

16 references·16 citing·36 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2014Reflective Practitioner8,325 cited
2000Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics8,080 cited
1988The System of Professions7,723 cited
1974Power: A Radical View6,655 cited
1990The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor.5,616 cited
1991Institutions5,253 cited
2000Path dependence in historical sociology3,466 cited
1997Democracy and disagreement2,975 cited
2004Why Deliberative Democracy?2,661 cited
2006Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies2,479 cited
1991The Legitimation of Power2,392 cited
1997Collaborative Planning2,273 cited
2001Trust: A Sociological Theory2,218 cited
1993The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning1,992 cited
1982Planning in the Face of Power1,787 cited
1995Democracy and Disagreement1,201 cited

Cited by

2017The Varying Interpretations of Public Interest: Making Sense of Finnish Urban Planners’ Conceptions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

26 cited

2019Emerging vacuums of strategic planning: an exploration of reforms in Finnish spatial planning23 cited

2023Agency and Structure in Urban and Regional Planning: An Illustrative Overview and Future Research Agenda20 cited

2021Performing a neoliberal city-regional imaginary: the case of Tampere tramway project20 cited

2021A Reflection on Transactive Planning: Transfer of Planning Knowledge in Local Community-Level Deliberation18 cited

2019Diffuse Institutional Trust and Specific Institutional Mistrust in Nordic Participatory Planning: Experience from Contested Urban Projects18 cited

2022Navigating swift and slow planning: planners’ balancing act in the design of participatory processes17 cited

2021Exploring the relationship between trust and participatory processes: Participation in urban development in Oslo, Madrid and Melbourne16 cited

2018Relationality of the Law: On the Legal Collisions in the Finnish Planning and Land Use Practices15 cited

2023Institutional Gaps in Agonistic and Communicative Planning Theories. Critical Implications of the ‘Systemic Turn’ in Deliberative Democracy Theory14 cited

2021“Let us be led by the residents”: Swedish dialogue experts’ stories about power, justification and ambivalence14 cited

2023Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries11 cited

2018Building Citizens’ Trust in Urban Infill: A Dynamic Approach11 cited

2019Critical pedagogy for the new planner: Mastering an inclusive perception of ‘The Other’11 cited

2024Whose visions and goals for sustainability? Planning, participation and depoliticisation in new urban neighbourhoods in Sweden9 cited

2024Planning’s value, planners’ values: defining and redefining for contemporary practice9 cited