SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authors beware! The rise of the predatory publisher
10 references·2 citing·32 second hop
Authors beware! The rise of the predatory publisher (2016)Authors beware! The rise of the predatory…Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World (2016)Characteristics of Hijacked J…You are invited to submit… (2015)You are invited to submit…New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. (2015)New corruption detected: Bogu…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Beyond Beall’s List: Better u…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Investigating journals: The d…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Predatory Publications in the Era of the Internet and Technology: Open Access Publications are at Risk (2022)Predatory Publications in the…Predatory Publishing in Ophthalmology: A Call for Awareness and Action (2020)Predatory Publishing in Ophth…Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reproducibility in Science (2014)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)Open Education Science (2018)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Scientific peer review (2011)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review (2014)Publishing in predatory open access journals: Authors' perspectives (2019)Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of “Academic Spam” (2020)Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive (2021)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services (2019)Is it Ethical for Journals to Request Self-citation? (2014)Evolving strategies of the predatory journals (2016)Predatory journals: Do not judge journals by their Editorial Board Members (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2015Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers163 cited
  • 2015You are invited to submit…114 cited
  • 2016Characteristics of Hijacked Journals and Predatory Publishers: Our Observations in the Academic World43 cited
  • 2015New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations.39 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Predatory Publications in the Era of the Internet and Technology: Open Access Publications are at Risk9 cited
  • 2020Predatory Publishing in Ophthalmology: A Call for Awareness and Action8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work