Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game

Isabel Thielmann · Daniel W. Heck · Benjamin E. Hilbig

69 citations0/0 files storedJudgment and Decision Making

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Abstract

Abstract Economic games offer a convenient approach for the study of prosocial behavior. As an advantage, they allow for straightforward implementation of different techniques to reduce socially desirable responding. We investigated the effectiveness of the most prominent of these techniques, namely providing behavior-contingent incentives and maximizing anonymity in three versions of the Trust Game: (i) a hypothetical version without monetary incentives and with a typical level of anonymity, (ii) an incentivized version with monetary incentives and the same (typical) level of anonymity, and (iii) an indirect questioning version without incentives but with a maximum level of anonymity, rendering responses inconclusive due to adding random noise via the Randomized Response Technique. Results from a large (N= 1,267) and heterogeneous sample showed comparable levels of trust for the hypothetical and incentivized versions using direct questioning. However, levels of trust decreased when maximizing the inconclusiveness of responses through indirect questioning. This implies that levels of trust might be particularly sensitive to changes in individuals’ anonymity but not necessarily to monetary incentives.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 69 citations exist upstream.

References

2010The weirdest people in the world?1995Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History 2011Dictator games: a meta study 2011When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior 1994Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games 2007Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?1999The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework 2006Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness

Cited by

2021Are social desirability scales desirable? A meta‐analytic test of the validity of social desirability scales in the context of prosocial behavior 2021Childhood maltreatment is associated with distrust and negatively biased emotion processing 2019Why People Trust: Solved Puzzles and Open Mysteries 2018Prejudice against Women Leaders: Insights from an Indirect Questioning Approach 2017Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.