Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior

16 references·15 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
2012Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting563 cited
2006The Impact Factor Game372 cited
2011The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity316 cited
2016Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors255 cited
2016The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise246 cited
2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
2015Emerging trends in peer review—a survey192 cited
2013Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries159 cited
2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
2012Speaker meaning and accountability in interaction130 cited
2014Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system103 cited
2012Decoupling the scholarly journal85 cited
2012Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network85 cited
2012Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation84 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2010

Is open peer review the fairest system? No

77 cited

Cited by

2018Challenges to open peer review39 cited
2022Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 202128 cited
2021Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud?26 cited
2022Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature23 cited
2021An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China22 cited
2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
2018Postpublication peer review: A crucial tool19 cited
2018Benefits and Threats to Using Social Media for Presenting and Implementing Evidence18 cited
2018PubMed Commons closes its doors to comments14 cited
2018Improving publication quality and the importance of Post Publication Peer Review: The illustrating example of X chromosome analysis and calculation of forensic parameters14 cited
2022Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates12 cited
2019Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure12 cited
2020Bringing the review process into the 21st century: Post-publication peer review10 cited
2025Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review process9 cited
2024Beyond disclaimers: the need for a curation-based model of PubMed7 cited