SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process
7 references·6 citing·39 second hop
How to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process (2017)How to Write an Effective Referee Report …Referee Recommendations (2014)Referee RecommendationsNine Facts about Top Journals in Economics (2013)Nine Facts about Top Journals…Reviewing Less—Progressing More (2012)Reviewing Less—Progressing Mo…Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory (2002)Evolving Standards for Academ…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The Slowdown of the Economics…Facts and Myths about Refereeing (1994)Facts and Myths about Referee…Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors (1990)Is There Value-Added from the…Learnings From 1000 Rejections (2024)Learnings From 1000 RejectionsHow to Be a More Effective Reviewer (2022)How to Be a More Effective Re…The remarkable growth in financial economics, 1974–2020 (2021)The remarkable growth in fina…Citations and the readers’ information-extracting costs of finance articles (2021)Citations and the readers’ in…The Remarkable Growth in Financial Economics, 1974-2020 (2020)The Remarkable Growth in Fina…What do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Leading Economics Journals (2017)What do Editors Maximize? Evi…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Aging and Productivity Among Economists (1998)Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration (2006)Do directors perform for pay? (2008)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)IS PEER REVIEW IN DECLINE? (2010)Seeds of Innovation in Accounting Scholarship (2012)Why Does Research in Finance Have so Little Impact? (2016)Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics (2003)Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back (2015)The Superiority of Economists (2015)Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (2016)Publishing While Female: are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review (2022)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Easy to read, easy to cite? (2018)Gatekeeping African studies: what does “editormetrics” indicate about journal governance? (2018)The imperial roots of global trade (2020)On the mechanics of economic development (1988)Economics : an emerging small world? (2004)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s (2005)Job Market Signaling (1973)The Economics of Science (2010)A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality (2011)Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure (1976)Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing (1987)Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds (1993)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)13 "DOES CULTURAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE AMERICAN CONSUMPTION?" (1998) (1998)Opening Access to Research (2015)What’s Your Identification Strategy? Innovation in Corporate Finance Research (2016)Not in the Same Boat: How Status Inconsistency Affects Research Performance in Business Schools (2017)Optimal Pricing Mechanisms with Unknown Demand (2003)An Examination of the Reliability of Prestigious Scholarly Journals: Evidence and Implications for Decision‐Makers (2007)Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study (2012)Community extension MSME's entrepreneurial activities in relation to poverty reduction (2022)Editor home bias? (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process514 cited
  • 2013Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics332 cited
  • 2002Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A q‐r Theory252 cited
  • 1994Facts and Myths about Refereeing147 cited
  • 1990Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors127 cited
  • 2012Reviewing Less—Progressing More61 cited
  • 2014Referee Recommendations44 cited

Cited by

  • 2017What do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Leading Economics Journals33 cited
  • 2021The remarkable growth in financial economics, 1974–202021 cited
  • 2020The Remarkable Growth in Financial Economics, 1974-202019 cited
  • 2022How to Be a More Effective Reviewer14 cited
  • 2021Citations and the readers’ information-extracting costs of finance articles12 cited
  • 2024Learnings From 1000 Rejections9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work