Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Assessing Agency-Level Performance Evaluation Reform in China: Can It Truly Serve as a Management Innovation?

16 references·2 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods81,948 cited
1979Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).11,425 cited
1996Creating public value: strategic management in government2,551 cited
1995Creating public value : strategic management in government2,353 cited
2008Management Innovation1,594 cited
2003Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures1,401 cited
1992Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China1,290 cited
1995Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy934 cited
2008The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform843 cited
2002The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector726 cited
2014Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms389 cited
2000Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform297 cited
2002The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector232 cited
2013The logics of performance management212 cited
2009Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China163 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1993Measurement and Meaningful Management133 cited

Cited by

2016Chinese Public Administration Review: Relaunching a Necessary Dialogue7 cited
2025Does negative feedback on financial performance affect managerial turnover?6 cited