References

• 2014Women in Academic Science1,020 cited
• 2006Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey195 cited
• 2015Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal125 cited
• 2010The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature84 cited
• 2009Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation84 cited
• 2016Increasing geographic diversity in the international conservation literature: A stalled process?70 cited
• 2015Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal59 cited
• 2016Author‐suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal42 cited
• 2008Experience, Time Investment, and Motivators of Nursing Journal Peer Reviewers39 cited
• 2015Reviewer recommendations and editors’ decisions for a conservation journal: Is it just a crapshoot? And do Chinese authors get a fair shot?33 cited
• 2013Are conservation biologists working too hard?31 cited
• 2008Systematic Variation in Reviewer Practice According to Country and Gender in the Field of Ecology and Evolution17 cited
• 2014Improving the reviewing process in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology16 cited
• 2010