SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Metasynthetic Madness
16 references·13 citing·45 second hop
Metasynthetic Madness (2016)Metasynthetic MadnessStandards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for Reporting Quali…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review (2011)'Scoping the scope' of a coch…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Conducting a critical interpr…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research (1998)Rationale and Standards for t…Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques (1997)Qualitative metasynthesis: Is…Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies (1988)Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizin…Meta-Ethnography (1988)Meta-EthnographyRapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis (2024)Rapid reviews methods series:…Qualitative meta‐synthesis (2022)Qualitative meta‐synthesisUnsettling Knowledge Synthesis Methods Using Institutional Ethnography: Reflections on the Scoping Review as a Critical Knowledge Synthesis Tool (2020)Unsettling Knowledge Synthesi…A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)A QuESt for speed: rapid qual…Lessons learned from applying Sandelowski and Barroso’s approach for synthesising qualitative research (2019)Lessons learned from applying…Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERG e reporting guidance (2019)Improving reporting of meta‐e…Ageing, old age and media: Critical appraisal of knowledge practices in academic research (2019)Ageing, old age and media: Cr…A typology of systematic reviews for synthesising evidence on health care (2019)A typology of systematic revi…A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance (2019)A scoping review found increa…Rediscovering the “Narrative” review (2018)Rediscovering the “Narrative”…Harnessing Energies, Resolving Tensions: Acknowledging a Dual Heritage for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (2018)Harnessing Energies, Resolvin…A Meta-Study of Qualitative Research Examining Sport and Recreation Experiences of Indigenous Youth (2018)A Meta-Study of Qualitative R…Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne (2017)Asking More of Qualitative Sy…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Thematic Analysis (2017)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing (2017)Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure (2009)Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research (2015)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research12,156 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology10,189 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 1988Meta-Ethnography2,721 cited
  • 1988Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies2,179 cited
  • 2006Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups2,073 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2011'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review1,259 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1997
Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques
1,049 cited
  • 1998Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research988 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018A Meta-Study of Qualitative Research Examining Sport and Recreation Experiences of Indigenous Youth31 cited
    • 2019A typology of systematic reviews for synthesising evidence on health care30 cited
    • 2024Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis28 cited
    • 2019Lessons learned from applying Sandelowski and Barroso’s approach for synthesising qualitative research28 cited
    • 2017Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne27 cited
    • 2022Qualitative meta‐synthesis26 cited
    • 2018Harnessing Energies, Resolving Tensions: Acknowledging a Dual Heritage for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis26 cited
    • 2020A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic25 cited
    • 2019Ageing, old age and media: Critical appraisal of knowledge practices in academic research23 cited
    • 2019A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance22 cited
    • 2020Unsettling Knowledge Synthesis Methods Using Institutional Ethnography: Reflections on the Scoping Review as a Critical Knowledge Synthesis Tool20 cited
    • 2018Rediscovering the “Narrative” review19 cited
    • 2019Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERG e reporting guidance16 cited