SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal
8 references·5 citing·40 second hop
The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal (2016)The ethics of peer and editorial requests…What Rights Do Authors Have? (2016)What Rights Do Authors Have?Watch out for cheats in citation game (2016)Watch out for cheats in citat…Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal (2016)Impact Factors and Prediction…Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric (2016)Beat it, impact factor! Publi…Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance (2015)Impacted Science: Impact Is N…Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Publishing: The peer-review s…Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Problems with Traditional Sci…Publish or perish in China (2010)Publish or perish in ChinaProxy failure in academia: More than just another example (2024)Proxy failure in academia: Mo…A brief review on article-, author-, and journal-level scientometric indices (2022)A brief review on article-, a…Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions (2020)Curriculum vitae: challenges …Potential for Meta-Scientific Inquiry to Improve the Usefulness of HRD Research Outcomes for Practice (2019)Potential for Meta-Scientific…Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protec…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Peer review and the publication process (2016)Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure (2017)Is Peer Review a Good Idea? (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)Journal Impact Factor: A Bumpy Ride in an Open Space (2019)Women Are Underrepresented and Receive Differential Outcomes at ASM Journals: a Six-Year Retrospective Analysis (2020)Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors (2014)Protecting Authors from Predatory Journals and Publishers (2016)Challenges to open peer review (2018)Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness (2021)Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review (1985)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes (1974)Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment (2010)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit (2021)Handling Ethics Dumping and Neo-Colonial Research: From the Laboratory to the Academic Literature (2022)Retraction Stigma and its Communication via Retraction Notices (2022)US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research (2013)Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals (2016)What price the building of world-class universities? Academic pressure faced by young lecturers at a research-centered University in China (2017)Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process (2015)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)HARK No More (2018)Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context (2018)CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? (2017)Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study (2017)How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What Is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals (2020)Using the Kano model to display the most cited authors and affiliated countries in schizophrenia research (2019)Whether article types of a scholarly journal are different in cited metrics using cluster analysis of MeSH terms to display (2019)Predicting article citations using data of 100 top-cited publications in the journal Medicine since 2011 (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam228 cited
  • 2016Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric220 cited
  • 2010Publish or perish in China184 cited
  • 2014Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review158 cited
  • 2016Watch out for cheats in citation game139 cited
  • 2015Impacted Science: Impact Is Not Importance66 cited
  • 2016What Rights Do Authors Have?49 cited
  • 2016Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal30 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions31 cited
  • 2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
  • 2022A brief review on article-, author-, and journal-level scientometric indices17 cited
  • 2019Potential for Meta-Scientific Inquiry to Improve the Usefulness of HRD Research Outcomes for Practice3 cited
  • 2024Proxy failure in academia: More than just another example1 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work