Judicial decision-making and ‘outside’ extra-legal knowledge: breaking down silos

Kylie Burns · Rachel Dioso‐Villa · Zoe Rathus

10 citations0/0 files storedGriffith Law Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies

Abstract

Judges apply law to facts. While this ‘umpire’ description of judicial decision-making is rhetorically (and often politically and publicly) attractive, it is of course a very incomplete account of ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

1989How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law 1995How the law thinks about children 1990How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law 1993The 'Truth' about Autopoiesis 1942An Approach to Problems of Evidence in the Administrative Process 1998The Normal Chaos of Family Law 2013Reflections on Judging 2016Divergent Paths

Cited by

2023Independent experts in care order proceedings: a scoping review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.