Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist

16 references·16 citing·43 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2015Summarizing systematic reviews2,581 cited
2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
2014Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview1,308 cited
2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
2009Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses713 cited
2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
2012A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011241 cited
2012Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

213 cited

2009Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy201 cited

2012The overview of reviews: Unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship.196 cited

Cited by

2020Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review533 cited
2018A Systematic Review of Reviews of the Outcome of Noninstitutional Child Maltreatment208 cited
2019Treatments for the Prevention and Management of Suicide187 cited
2017Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews134 cited
2017Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge133 cited
2019A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions131 cited
2017Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis122 cited
2020Methods for depicting overlap in overviews of systematic reviews: An introduction to static tabular and graphical displays116 cited
2019Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data71 cited
2018Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study60 cited
2018Reporting guidelines on how to write a complete and transparent abstract for overviews of systematic reviews of health care interventions56 cited
2019The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions52 cited
2021Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis46 cited
2020Product-service systems benefits and barriers: an overview of literature review papers39 cited
2018Conceptual and practical classification of research reviews and other evidence synthesis products37 cited
2019Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in nutrition research35 cited