SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D
16 references·3 citing·43 second hop
A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D (2017)A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing…Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer (2016)Wasted research when systemat…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously? (2015)How to conduct systematic rev…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample (2011)Precision of healthcare syste…Applications of text mining within systematic reviews (2011)Applications of text mining w…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews (2010)A new algorithm for reducing …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)An evidence-based practice gu…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Reducing Workload in Systemat…Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved (1999)Estimating Time to Conduct a …Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study (2021)Evaluating the relationship b…Quality control for crowdsourcing citation screening: the importance of assessment number and qualification set size (2020)Quality control for crowdsour…Identification and Evaluation of Controlled Trials in Pediatric Cardiology: Crowdsourced Scoping Review and Creation of Accessible Searchable Database (2020)Identification and Evaluation…The American Heritage Word Frequency Book (1973)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Searching for Studies (2008)Are Health Behavior Change Interventions That Use Online Social Networks Effective? A Systematic Review (2014)Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (2014)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2009An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies607 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2005Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification410 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2011Applications of text mining within systematic reviews212 cited
  • 1999Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved163 cited
  • 2016Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer125 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
104 cited
  • 2010A new algorithm for reducing the workload of experts in performing systematic reviews100 cited
  • 2011Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample80 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Quality control for crowdsourcing citation screening: the importance of assessment number and qualification set size30 cited
    • 2021Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study14 cited
    • 2020Identification and Evaluation of Controlled Trials in Pediatric Cardiology: Crowdsourced Scoping Review and Creation of Accessible Searchable Database14 cited