Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Simulation of LD Identification Accuracy Using a Pattern of Processing Strengths and Weaknesses Method With Multiple Measures

15 references·16 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Essentials of Cross-Battery Assessment518 cited
2002Validity of IQ-Discrepancy Classifications of Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis370 cited
2000What Definitions of Learning Disability Say and Don't Say294 cited
2004School Neuropsychology: A Practitioner's Handbook270 cited
2010Critical Issues in Response-To-Intervention, Comprehensive Evaluation, and Specific Learning Disabilities Identification and Intervention: An Expert White Paper Consensus212 cited
2010Essentials of Specific Learning Disability Identification174 cited
2012Evaluation of the Technical Adequacy of Three Methods for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities Based on Cognitive Discrepancies113 cited
2002Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second edition (WIAT-II)113 cited
2015State learning disability eligibility criteria: A comprehensive review.101 cited
2013Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses: Identification rates, agreement, and validity for learning disabilities identification.95 cited
2016Cognitive discrepancy models for specific learning disabilities identification: Simulations of psychometric limitations.56 cited
2016Classification agreement analysis of Cross-Battery Assessment in the identification of specific learning disorders in children and youth54 cited
2014The effect of achievement test selection on identification of learning disabilities within a patterns of strengths and weaknesses framework.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

51 cited

2012Classification and Identification of Learning Disabilities44 cited

2015Do processing patterns of strengths and weaknesses predict differential treatment response?41 cited

Cited by

2018Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-horn-Carroll theory117 cited
2018Cognitive profile analysis in school psychology: History, issues, and continued concerns91 cited
2019The Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities: A Summary of Research on Best Practices.46 cited
2023The Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia36 cited
2018A Misuse of IQ Scores: Using the Dual Discrepancy/Consistency Model for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities33 cited
2021Beyond the Rhetoric of Evidence-Based Assessment: A Framework for Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice33 cited
2020How Do School Psychologists Interpret Intelligence Tests for the Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities?32 cited
2019Further Examination of a Critical Assumption Underlying the Dual-Discrepancy/Consistency Approach to Specific Learning Disability Identification24 cited
2022Dual discrepancy/consistency pattern of strengths and weaknesses method of specific learning disability identification: Classification accuracy when combining clinical judgment with assessment data19 cited
2024A Systematic Review of the PSW Diagnostic Accuracy Evidence for SLD Identification: Is It Time to Abandon PSW?15 cited
2022Disability Diagnoses: Seven Sins of Clinicians15 cited
2021Are There Cognitive Profiles Unique to Students With Learning Disabilities? A Latent Profile Analysis of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition Scores11 cited
2019The discrepancy between verbal and visuoperceptual IQ in children with a specific learning disorder: An analysis of 1624 cases10 cited
2024The effect of measurement error on the positive predictive value of PSW methods for SLD identification: How buffer zones dispel the illusion of inaccuracy9 cited
2020Comparing Math LD Diagnostic Rates Obtained Using LDAC and DSM-5 Criteria: Implications for the Field5 cited
2017Commentary on “Strengths and Weaknesses in the Intellectual Profile of Different Subtypes of Specific Learning Disorder” (Toffalini et al., 2017)5 cited