Using collaborative two‐stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course

Kimberly A. Fournier · Jannelle Couret · Jason B. Ramsay · Joshua L. Caulkins

68 citations0/0 files storedAnatomical Sciences Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Student Assessment and Feedback Student Stress and Coping

Abstract

Large enrollment foundational courses are perceived as "high stakes" because of their potential to act as barriers for progression to the next course or admittance to a program. The nature of gateway courses makes them ideal settings to explore the relationship between anxiety, pedagogical interventions, and student performance. Here, two-stage collaborative examinations were implemented to improve test-taking skills and address widespread test anxiety in an introductory human anatomy course. Test anxiety data were collected (using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire) before the first examination and last examination. Most students experienced decreased test anxiety over the course of the semester; however, some students may have experienced performance limiting conditions due to test anxiety at the end of the semester based on academic ability in the course (in "C" students when compared to "A" students: P < 0.00006 and "B" students: P < 0.05), overall academic ability (in academically weaker students: P < 0.025), and demographic factors (in women: P < 0.025). The strongest performances on examinations were primarily observed in already academically strong students (mean individual performance: P < 0.000, mean group performance: P < 0.000). Furthermore, changes in test anxiety were not significantly associated with the group portion of the examinations. Patterns of changes in test anxiety over the course of the semester underscore a complex interaction between test anxiety, student background, and student performance. Results suggest that pathways for test anxiety in "high stakes" courses may be separate from the mechanisms responsible for the benefits of collaborative testing. Anat Sci Educ 10: 409-422. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.1997A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.1993Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)2005Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Undergraduate and Graduate Students.2003Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry 2001Testing Stereotype Threat: Does Anxiety Explain Race and Sex Differences in Achievement?2009Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biology and Why We Need Them 2003STUDENT RETENTION OF COURSE CONTENT IS IMPROVED BY COLLABORATIVE-GROUP TESTING

Cited by

2020Basic Needs, Goals and Motivation 2020Self-Regulation and Control in Personality Functioning

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.