Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Co-Producing a Nicer Neighbourhood: Why do People Participate in Local Community Development Projects?

16 references·16 citing·44 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2011Case study research: design and methods21,763 cited
1995Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation2,905 cited
1996Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development2,656 cited
2014A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey2,330 cited
1996Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics.1,155 cited
1981CONSUMERS AS COPRODUCERS OF PUBLIC SERVICES: SOME ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS759 cited
2012From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value647 cited
2015Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions628 cited
2012Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda584 cited
2006Citizens and co-production of welfare services390 cited
2009Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production387 cited
2002Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?324 cited
2014Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services308 cited
2012Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence299 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005

Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy

276 cited

2007Governance, Complexity, and Democratic Participation257 cited

Cited by

2021Travelling along the public service co-production road: a bibliometric analysis and interpretive review52 cited
2021Organizational maturity for co-creation: Towards a multi-attribute decision support model for public organizations50 cited
2020Social‐Psychological Context Moderates Incentives to Co‐produce: Evidence from a Large‐Scale Survey Experiment on Park Upkeep in an Urban Setting44 cited
2023Why Citizens Engage in Co-Production: A Theoretical Framework and Experimental Evidence41 cited
2019The sustainability of outcomes in temporary co-production41 cited
2019Coproduction and cost efficiency: a structured literature review26 cited
2021The politics of insufficiency: ambivalence and boundary work in the co-production of welfare services24 cited
2023Expectations versus reality: the sustainability of co-production approaches over time23 cited
2022A comprehensive framework for the activation, management, and evaluation of Co-production in the public sector22 cited
2020Citizens’ Motivations for Co-production: Willingness, Ability and Opportunity at Play15 cited
2023What motivates users to report service‐related issues? A study on coproduction in a smart public service15 cited
2022Realizing public values in the co-production of public services: the effect of efficacy and trust on coping with public values conflicts14 cited
2023Monetary and symbolic rewards: do they matter for fostering co-commissioning and co-delivery of public services?14 cited
2023Co-creation service readiness model: a decision support for the selection of public services suitable for improvement through co-creation13 cited
2024Participatory governance for the temporary use of urban abandoned areas. A socio-spatial approach to the “Old Hospital” area in Alexandroupolis, Greece11 cited
20207. Co-production and Co-creation9 cited