Implementing the Flipped Classroom in Teacher Education: Evidence from Turkey.

Abstract

Introduction Enhancing students' learning experiences and meeting their needs and expectations have been among primary concerns of higher education over three decades (Demirer & Sahin, 2013; Garrison & Hanuka, 2004). Therefore, extensive research has been conducted in order to investigate ways of improving teaching and learning environment (Biggs & Tang, 2011). Blended learning (BL) has emerged with its potential to transform higher education institutions to supplement traditional classroom setting and increase quality of student learning (Garrison & Hanuka, 2004). Despite its growing popularity, there is not an agreed upon single definition of BL in literature. In Singh and Reed's (2001) definition, BL refers to learning program using more than one delivery model to increase students' academic achievement and reduce costs. In Banados' words (2006), BL is a combination of technology and classroom instruction in flexible approach to learning that recognises benefits of delivering some training and assessment online but also uses other modes to make up complete training programme which can improve learning outcomes and/or save (p. 534). According to Garrison and Vaughan (2008), BL is about thoughtful integration of face-to-face and online learning; redesigning of course to increase student engagement; and restructuring and replacement of traditional class hours. They add that BL blends the best of traditional and Web-based learning experiences, and this blend or integration is multiplicative, not additive (p. 7). Common to these definitions is recognition of BL as combination of face-to-face and online-delivery methods to enhance students' learning and reduce costs. The use of BL has been reported to be on rise in higher education (Garrison & Vaughan, 2008; Graham, Woodfield, & Harrison, 2013). Its popularity is attributed to research suggesting that BL results in improved learning outcomes (Bonk & Graham, 2006; Vaughan, 2010), improved pedagogy (Graham, 2006), increased learner motivation and satisfaction (Collopy & Arnold, 2009; Fulkerth, 2010), increased interactions (Bonk & Graham, 2006; Delialioglu & Yildirim, 2007), and reduced costs (Bonk & Graham, 2006; Graham, 2006). In recent years, flipped or inverted classroom, falling under broad definition of blended learning, has gained prominence in higher education as an alternative pedagogical model reversing what traditionally occurs in and out of class. The flipped classroom The flipped classroom is an emerging pedagogical model in which traditional lecture is moved outside classroom via technology and assigned as homework while in-class time is spent on collaborative inquiry-based learning (Bergman & Sams, 2012; Lage, Platt, & Treglia, 2000; Stone, 2012; Tucker, 2012). The flipped classroom is defined by Bishop and Verleger (2013) as follows: The flipped classroom is new pedagogical method, which employs asynchronous video lectures and practice problems as homework, and active, group-based problem solving activities in classroom. It represents unique combination of learning theories once thought to be incompatible- active, problem-based learning activities founded upon constructivist ideology and instructional lectures derived from direct instruction methods founded upon behaviourist principles. (p. 1) The flipped classroom model has developed through years with contributions from several researchers. In 1996, Mazur argued against using lectures and having passive students in classroom. He used technique called Peer Instruction to change traditional instructional model. He asked his students to prepare for class by reading assigned materials so that they could be actively engaged in learning process with their peers (Mazur, 2009). …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 127 citations exist upstream.