Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Forensic psychologists’ perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations.

16 references·16 citing·37 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook48,401 cited
1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.46,361 cited
1968The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research39,440 cited
2011Thinking, Fast and Slow14,316 cited
1977Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.11,315 cited
1996Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data11,180 cited
1975The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays.9,103 cited
1990The case for motivated reasoning.9,014 cited
1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises7,230 cited
1956Rational choice and the structure of the environment.5,918 cited
1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.4,582 cited
2021A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research4,472 cited
2000“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”4,251 cited
2004Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis2,640 cited
2002Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.1,909 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited

Cited by

2022A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.99 cited
2017Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science94 cited
2017Why do forensic experts disagree? Sources of unreliability and bias in forensic psychology evaluations.60 cited
2020Reflective practice in clinical psychology: Reflections from basic psychological science.53 cited
2020Concepts, Controversies And Conundrums Of “Alienation:” Lessons Learned In A Decade And Reflections On Challenges Ahead32 cited
2025Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects29 cited
2019Forensic clinicians’ understanding of bias.23 cited
2016Are Forensic Experts Already Biased before Adversarial Legal Parties Hire Them?22 cited
2020Making the case for videoconferencing and remote child custody evaluations (RCCEs): The empirical, ethical, and evidentiary arguments for accepting new technology.21 cited
2017Assessing the Risk of Intimate Partner Violence: Expert Evaluations Versus the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment16 cited
2021Recognizing and avoiding bias to improve child custody evaluations: Convergent data are not sufficient for scientific assessment14 cited
2018The Cognitive and Social Psychological Bases of Bias in Forensic Mental Health Judgments13 cited
2020Expert Reliability in Legal Proceedings: “Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe, With Which Expert Should We Go?”12 cited
2024Forensic Neuropsychology Goes from Nowhere to Almost Everywhere: Lessons Learned During Decades of Practice6 cited
2023Identifying and managing evaluator biases in parenting plan evaluations4 cited
2025Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts4 cited