SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When and why the second-order and bifactor models are distinguishable · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleWhen and why the second-order and bifactor models are distinguishable

Maxwell Armand Mansolf2017

Article2017

When and why the second-order and bifactor models are distinguishable

Maxwell Armand Mansolf · Steven P. Reise

122 citations·0/0 files stored·Intelligence

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Cognitive Abilities and Testing Mental Health Research Topics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 122 citations exist upstream.

References

2012lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling 1988On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models 2008Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit 1960Modern factor analysis 1968Modern Factor Analysis 1992Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance.1957The Development of Hierarchical Factor Solutions 2006A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life

Cited by

2019Riskier Tests of the Validity of the Bifactor Model of Psychopathology 2017The Bifactor Model Fits Better Than the Higher-Order Model in More Than 90% of Comparisons for Mental Abilities Test Batteries 2019Transcultural Adaptation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) for Brazil and Portugal 2020Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology.2022Sample Size Requirements for Bifactor Models

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Using Bifactor Models to Examine the Predictive Validity of Hierarchical Constructs: Pros, Cons, and Solutionsarticle · 8 shared references 2022Misbegotten methodologies and forgotten lessons from Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine: A demonstration with competing structural models of psychopathology.article · 7 shared references 2020Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitationsreview · 6 shared references 2019Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.article · 6 shared references 2018Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children – Fifth UK Edition: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 16 primary and secondary subtestsarticle · 6 shared references 2017An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciencesarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2017

Typearticle

Published2017-02-06

VenueIntelligence

ISSN-L0160-2896

Languageen

Citations122

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.intell.2017.01.012

openalex_workW2586695058

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022

Rasch Measurement Model

2018Construct Validity of the WISC-V in Clinical Cases: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the 10 Primary Subtests

2017Reliability and factorial validity of the Canadian Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition