SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project
15 references·5 citing·51 second hop
Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project (2017)Comparison of two independent systematic …Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Why Science Is Not Necessaril…Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses (2012)Effect of reporting bias on m…Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Meta-analysis of individual p…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data (2007)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Value of updating a systematic review in surgery using individual patient data (2004)Value of updating a systemati…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head (2002)Individual patient‐ versus gr…Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: which evidence should general practitioners heed? (1999)Conflicting conclusions from …Meta-analysis under scrutiny (1997)Meta-analysis under scrutinyMeta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research (1997)Meta-analysis and the meta-ep…A comparison of meta-analytic results using literature vs individual patient data. Paternal cell immunization for recurrent miscarriage (1995)A comparison of meta-analytic…Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Meta-analysis of the literatu…A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics (2025)A scoping review on metrics t…Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey (2023)Systematic reviewers' perspec…Feasibility study and evaluation of expert opinion on the semi-automated meta-analysis and the conventional meta-analysis (2022)Feasibility study and evaluat…Overlapping network meta‐analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality (2021)Overlapping network meta‐anal…Moral entrepreneurship, the power‐knowledge nexus, and the Cochrane “crisis” (2019)Moral entrepreneurship, the p…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders (1997)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Multivariate Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Ignoring Within-Study Correlation (2009)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research (2017)COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time (2019)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods (1999)Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Multiple Treatment Comparisons: An Introduction to Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2008)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0 (2015)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Anxiety and Depressive Disorders in Offspring of Parents With Anxiety Disorders (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2010Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting1,701 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 1993Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?769 cited
  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 2012Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting563 cited
  • 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data280 cited
  • 2012Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses254 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research211 cited
  • 1995A comparison of meta-analytic results using literature vs individual patient data. Paternal cell immunization for recurrent miscarriage142 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis under scrutiny51 cited
  • 1999Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: which evidence should general practitioners heed?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

44 cited
  • 2004Value of updating a systematic review in surgery using individual patient data28 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Moral entrepreneurship, the power‐knowledge nexus, and the Cochrane “crisis”21 cited
    • 2021Overlapping network meta‐analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality21 cited
    • 2022Feasibility study and evaluation of expert opinion on the semi-automated meta-analysis and the conventional meta-analysis14 cited
    • 2025A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics13 cited
    • 2023Systematic reviewers' perspectives on replication of systematic reviews: A survey12 cited