SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews
4 references·16 citing·42 second hop
Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews (2017)Next-generation systematic reviews: prosp…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Integration of evidence from …Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The scandal of poor medical r…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines (2023)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing mindfulness-based programs for mental health promotion (2023)Systematic review and individ…Meta-analysis. What have we learned? (2022)Meta-analysis. What have we l…Daytime napping and cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: A systematic review (2022)Daytime napping and cardiovas…Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses (2021)Implications of the open scie…A framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) of aggregate data from randomised trials (2021)A framework for prospective, …Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study (2020)Use of AMSTAR-2 in the method…Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for mental health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review (2020)Efficacy of psychosocial inte…Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence (2020)Efficacy of interventions to …The systematic review/meta‐analysis epidemic: a tale of glucocorticoid therapy in total knee arthroplasty (2019)The systematic review/meta‐an…The effectiveness of interventions addressing loneliness in older persons: An umbrella review (2019)The effectiveness of interven…Limited Usefulness of Meta-Analysis for Informing Patient Care (2019)Limited Usefulness of Meta-An…A guide to prospective meta-analysis (2019)A guide to prospective meta-a…The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis (2018)The role of meta-analyses and…Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people (2017)Systematic reviews: guidance …If there is only one author or only one database was searched, a study should not be called a systematic review (2017)If there is only one author o…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata (2017)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Defining and Analyzing the Problem (2019)Trait resilience and mental health in older adults: A meta‐analytic review (2020)Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A new ecosystem for evidence synthesis (2020)A practical guide to preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Searching clinical trials registers: guide for systematic reviewers (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Primary-level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low- and middle-income countries (2021)The inter-agency standing committee (IASC) guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in emergency settings: a critique (2022)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The sharing economy is not always greener: a review and consolidation of empirical evidence (2023)Effectiveness of mindfulness‐based interventions on the well‐being of healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta‐analysis (2024)Economic Inequality and Mental Health: Causality, Mechanisms, and Interventions (2025)Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice (2002)The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 1994The scandal of poor medical research897 cited
  • 2009Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses713 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for mental health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review348 cited
  • 2020Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence148 cited
  • 2019A guide to prospective meta-analysis125 cited
  • 2023Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing mindfulness-based programs for mental health promotion114 cited
  • 2017Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people109 cited
  • 2022Daytime napping and cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality: A systematic review70 cited
  • 2019The effectiveness of interventions addressing loneliness in older persons: An umbrella review68 cited
  • 2020Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study65 cited
  • 2018The role of meta-analyses and umbrella reviews in assessing the harms of psychotropic medications: beyond qualitative synthesis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

44 cited
  • 2023Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines35 cited
  • 2017If there is only one author or only one database was searched, a study should not be called a systematic review35 cited
  • 2022Meta-analysis. What have we learned?34 cited
  • 2021Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses33 cited
  • 2021A framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) of aggregate data from randomised trials31 cited
  • 2019Limited Usefulness of Meta-Analysis for Informing Patient Care28 cited
  • 2019The systematic review/meta‐analysis epidemic: a tale of glucocorticoid therapy in total knee arthroplasty28 cited