SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Preference and reinforcer efficacy of high‐ and low‐tech items: A comparison of item type and duration of access
15 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Preference and reinforcer efficacy of high‐ and low‐tech items: A comparison of item type and duration of access (2017)Preference and reinforcer efficacy of hig…Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference (2014)Distributed and accumulated r…The effect of instructional use of an iPad® on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two students with autism (2013)The effect of instructional u…OBSERVER TRAINING REVISITED: A COMPARISON OF IN VIVO AND VIDEO INSTRUCTION (2012)OBSERVER TRAINING REVISITED: …ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULE ASSESSMENTS OF STIMULUS VALUE (2009)ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN…REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE: AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER EFFICACY (2008)REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE: AN E…Economic demand and essential value. (2008)Economic demand and essential…THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTENDED STIMULUS AVAILABILITY ON PREFERENCE (2007)THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTE…Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice (2004)Dynamic changes in reinforcer…DYNAMIC CHANGES IN REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS: THEORETICAL, METHODOLOGICAL, AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH (2003)DYNAMIC CHANGES IN REINFORCER…ASSESSING REINFORCERS UNDER PROGRESSIVE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS (2001)ASSESSING REINFORCERS UNDER P…EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIM…A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHE…Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (1983)Single-case research designs:…EFFECTS OF INCREMENT SIZE AND REINFORCER VOLUME ON PROGRESSIVE RATIO PERFORMANCE (1963)EFFECTS OF INCREMENT SIZE AND…Schedules of reinforcement. (1957)Schedules of reinforcement.Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners (2021)Stimulus Preference Assessmen…The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (1939)TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY (1994)ON THE APPLIED USE OF PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT (2008)THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF UNPROMPTED RESPONDING ON THE SKILL ACQUISITION OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM (2009)Token reinforcement: Translational research and application (2018)MOTIVATING OPERATIONS AND TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEM: SOME FURTHER REFINEMENTS (2003)Single-Case Designs for Educational Research (2004)The Use of Video Modeling via a Video iPod and a System of Least Prompts to Improve Transitional Behaviors for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders in the General Education Classroom (2009)Using an iPad® App to Improve Sight Word Reading Fluency for At-Risk First Graders (2014)A Comparison between iPad-Assisted and Teacher-Directed Reading Instruction for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) (2015)Effectiveness of iPad apps on visual-motor skills among children with special needs between 4y0m–7y11m (2016)Principles of Behavior (1944)TOKEN REINFORCEMENT: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS (2009)BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND EMPIRICAL PUBLIC POLICY (2013)Bleak Present, Bright Future: Online Episodic Future Thinking, Scarcity, Delay Discounting, and Food Demand (2017)Some quantitative properties of anxiety. (1941)Science and Human Behavior (1953)Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. (1953)Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1971)AN IMPLICIT TECHNOLOGY OF GENERALIZATION 1 (1977)Habituation: A dual-process theory. (1970)Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1972 (1974)Effects of an expanding-spaced vs massed exposure schedule on fear reduction and return of fear (1998)The Effects of Presenting High-Preference Items, Paired With Choice, Via Computer-Based Video Programming on Task Completion of Students With Autism (2006)Basic and translational evaluation of renewal of operant responding (2015)Standardized automated training of rhesus monkeys for neuroscience research in their housing environment (2017)Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, (1966)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis (2002)USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment (2005)Discounting of Monetary and Directly Consumable Rewards (2007)Preference for and Efficacy of Accumulated and Distributed Response–Reinforcer Arrangements During Skill Acquisition (2018)Further investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction for escape‐maintained destructive behavior (2019)An evaluation of synchronous reinforcement for increasing on‐task behavior in preschool children (2020)A Comparison of the Properties of Different Reinforcers (1978)Defining empirically supported therapies. (1998)The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education (2005)Combining Nonoverlap and Trend for Single-Case Research: Tau-U (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1957Schedules of reinforcement.4,959 cited
  • 1983Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings2,685 cited
  • 1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,701 cited
  • 1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,417 cited
  • 2008Economic demand and essential value.838 cited
  • 1963EFFECTS OF INCREMENT SIZE AND REINFORCER VOLUME ON PROGRESSIVE RATIO PERFORMANCE301 cited
  • 2013The effect of instructional use of an iPad® on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two students with autism155 cited
  • 2001ASSESSING REINFORCERS UNDER PROGRESSIVE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS135 cited
  • 2003DYNAMIC CHANGES IN REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS: THEORETICAL, METHODOLOGICAL, AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH103 cited
  • 2014Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference70 cited
  • 2008REINFORCEMENT MAGNITUDE: AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER EFFICACY67 cited
  • 2009ON THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES AND PROGRESSIVE‐RATIO SCHEDULE ASSESSMENTS OF STIMULUS VALUE64 cited
  • 2004Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice50 cited
  • 2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

THE EFFECTS OF BRIEF AND EXTENDED STIMULUS AVAILABILITY ON PREFERENCE
39 cited
  • 2012OBSERVER TRAINING REVISITED: A COMPARISON OF IN VIVO AND VIDEO INSTRUCTION39 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners21 cited