SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel
5 references·0 citing·16 second hop
Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel (2017)Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading S…Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012 (2013)Use of Clavien-Dindo Classifi…Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopaedic Surgery (2012)Reliability of a Complication…Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations (2011)Reporting and Grading of Comp…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Measuring nominal scale agree…Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations (2007)The spread of true and false news online (2018)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Reliability of the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Complication Classification System in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)Reporting Complications in Spinal Surgery—a Systematic Literature Review (2021)Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature (2002)Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change (2007)Interobserver variability of C lavien– D indo scoring in urology (2014)The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications is Not a Statistically Reliable System for Grading Morbidity in Pediatric Urology (2015)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Quality Assessment of Partial Nephrectomy Complications Reporting Using EAU Standardised Quality Criteria (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1971Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.8,717 cited
  • 2011Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urologic Surgical Procedures: An ad hoc EAU Guidelines Panel Assessment and Recommendations586 cited
  • 2012Reliability of a Complication Classification System for Orthopaedic Surgery363 cited
  • 2013Use of Clavien-Dindo Classification in Reporting and Grading Complications after Urological Surgical Procedures: Analysis of 2010 to 2012136 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work